All ideas

I would like to be able to release retainage based on how much was retained per month. Sometimes a sub will bill through August, but we have only been owner funded through June. I would like to be able to release retainage through June instead of ...

Currently Trimble does not have the ability to generate a G703 with the retainage amounts specified in the system. If you have a subcontractor that has 0% retainage on materials and 10% retainage for labor the amount on the G703 is pulled from the...

i had to reload my notary information, i couldnt delete my own user and i had a new email address - so i had to jump through hoops to just get my email updated. a simple task that caused lots of extra work and is still not complete because i have ...

We enter all the compliance items into Vista and it would be nice if it all transferred to Trimble Pay for the Subcontractor.

The current process requires 4 steps to release retainage for each subcontractor. 1) Select job, 2) Select vendor, 3) Select Retainage, 4) Select Release retainage... Then repeate... When we have a large job with a ton of vendors, this process tak...

When Retainage is released, Triemble Pay automatically emails the subcontractor and states "Retainage has been released, please log in to submit your payment". This waste everyones time as the sub then logs onto Triemble Pay only to find out they ...

Many times, a sub is owed for prior pay apps due to compliance or payment issues, but we would like the sub to bill their final billing. We should allow a sub to change the conditional final to include amounts owed to them to make them final.

It is horrendously time consuming to change the approver sequence and approver members for all projects one by one when trying to implement a revised invoice review workflow. Please implement member configuration templates that can be set up in Co...

We would like give access to higher-level management to view projects and run reports, but not have the ability to credit projects or edit information. Something similar to 'read-only' access.

We are being told that a sub cannot bill progress and retention at the same time. The work around is we, the GC, has to click on complete contract. A sub should be allowed to bill both. If the GC does not want them to, they can reject the billing.