We are being told that a sub cannot bill progress and retention at the same time. The work around is we, the GC, has to click on complete contract. A sub should be allowed to bill both. If the GC does not want them to, they can reject the billing.
Please add an "Attachment too large" error, or add a note that states "File cannot exceed 10MB" for attachments when adding necessary documents to pay app.
Allow Subcontractor to reference their invoice number for a pay application
When submitting a pay application, we have subcontractors asking for a place for them to enter their ERP system's invoice number. When receiving payment from us, the payment references the invoice number/pay app number that is created by Trimble P...
SOV to be approved before 1st pay application submitted
It would be useful to have the SOV be approved before a subcontractor can submit their 1st pay application. This ensures that the SOV lines are correct the 1st time and the subcontractor doesn't have to delete and resubmit their pay application.
The subs keep uploading their requisitions in portrait, but we need to be able to rotate the document into landscape to stamp the approval so it's in the bottom right hand corner. We keep having to rejected the invoices and having them rescan beca...
I would like to have the option to allow subcontractors / vendors who work off of Purchase Orders, a way to bill over their contract sum without issuing a change order.
There needs to be the ability to have a $0 line item in the SOV to allow for section Headers. For example some trades breakout by Section and Floor the various material and labor cost. Or you may have Building 1, Building 2 and then have floor 1, ...
The ability to release retainage for all subcontractors at the same time.
Instead of having to do 7-10 extra more clicks/steps for releasing retainage for each subcontractor on a job, there should be an option that can choose all and release at the same time to reduce our time in clicking x amount of times (depending on...
On larger projects the SOV can get quite extensive, so it would be beneficial to be able to hide from view the line items that have been billed 100% to make reading the SOV simpler as the project progresses. Even if it hid those lines temporarily ...